Add pivot feature. #146

[epost]

This takes the pivot feature from ryan4 branch (PR #128) and resolves merge conflicts and other issues as needed.

[epost]

Hi @wisnesky, could you sign off your contribution on this PR using the clahub details link? When that's done, we can merge this. Thanks!

[wisnesky]

Did something change? Why are these pivot contributions triggering a new (re?) licensing request but not any other the other contributions?

…

On Aug 7, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Erik Post ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @wisnesky <https://github.com/wisnesky>, could you sign off your contribution on this PR using the clahub details <https://www.clahub.com/agreements/statebox/cql> link? When that's done, we can merge this. Thanks! — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#147?email_source=notifications&email_token=AA2QKN3ZB624W2U4RIUVOS3QDMPZLA5CNFSM4IJLOFKKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD3ZPOQQ#issuecomment-519239490>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA2QKN5DCIAG2BH5PVAOQILQDMPZLANCNFSM4IJLOFKA>.

[epost]

@wisnesky Hmm, I'm not sure; had you signed off before? Maybe it's because this is a new PR rebased on master?

[wisnesky]

Yeah, I signed a PDF over a year ago, not anything online.

…

On Aug 7, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Erik Post ***@***.***> wrote: @wisnesky <https://github.com/wisnesky> Hmm, I'm not sure; had you signed off before? Maybe it's because this is a new PR rebased on master? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#147?email_source=notifications&email_token=AA2QKN474IFEEXDLTGGFV7LQDMTC7A5CNFSM4IJLOFKKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD3ZRU5Q#issuecomment-519248502>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA2QKN42J6SNQIHA2QVQD7TQDMTC7ANCNFSM4IJLOFKA>.

[epost]

@wisnesky Oh! Right, that's the reason then; clahub is an automated service that checks whether every contributor has agreed to the CLA.

[epost]

So @wisnesky, would you mind signing off here so that this PR can be merged? CLA Hub is preventing the merge from happening, probably because it doesn't know about the PDF. (This should be a one-time thing only, if I'm not mistaken.)

[wisnesky]

OK, but for the record I interpret this to mean the original agreement is still in place, and this is a technical fix.

…

On Aug 7, 2019, at 5:10 PM, Erik Post ***@***.***> wrote: So @wisnesky <https://github.com/wisnesky>, would you mind signing off here <https://www.clahub.com/agreements/statebox/cql> so that this PR can be merged? CLA Hub is preventing the merge from happening, probably because it doesn't know about the PDF. (This should be a one-time thing only, if I'm not mistaken.) — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#147?email_source=notifications&email_token=AA2QKN5L2XDZYXWESRVIMULQDM25BA5CNFSM4IJLOFKKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD3ZXANY#issuecomment-519270455>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA2QKN6WSQ56KIWSUQGG4A3QDM25BANCNFSM4IJLOFKA>.

[epost]

Thanks @wisnesky! 👍 That is my understanding too. @wires, could you chime in?

[wires]

👍 yeah thats correct Ryan, it is not possible with that app to pre-auth people, so everyone has to sign it again. I tried to keep the CLA minimal as a workaround, instead of copying all the legal stuff from the contract verbatim