adjusting notation of error term in regression docs - #9361
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
LGTM. Thanks, I agree. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi all, new contributor but very much enjoy the syntax and implementations of statistical models. As a tiny first contribution, I changed the \mu to \epsilon in the OLS documentation. I think this is more standard notation in statistics, I'm not sure about other fields but since it's mostly a statistical concept it seems like this would be more straightforward. I think \mu could be confused with a mean, which is usually its meaning.
If you don't like the change, feel free to reject it :)