docs(seo): cross-link integrations, cookbook recipes, and topic hubs - #75
Merged
Conversation
Third Days-0-14 item from SEO-OPPORTUNITIES.md (technical fix #4): internal-linking depth. Integration pages, cookbook recipes, and topic hubs were under-connected (all 27 integration pages linked no topic hub; 8 orphan integration pages linked nothing; topic hubs were pure RecipeGrids with zero outbound integration links). 107 internal links woven into existing prose across 82 files: - Integrations: every page links a relevant topic hub (agents for frameworks, computer-use for vision-loop pages, browser-automation for playwright/puppeteer/selenium); the 8 orphans (x402, replit, codex, claude-code, openclaw, pi-agent, hermes-agent, stackblitz) get links for the first time. - Recipes: backlinks to their matching integration page where one exists, plus a topic-hub link; mapped non-identical names (openai-agents -> openai-agents-sdk, vercel-ai-sdk -> ai-sdk). - Topic hubs: a new Related integrations section after the recipe grid on 8 hubs (playwright, browser-use, computer-use, captchas, browser-automation, subagents, mobile, typed-output). Proposals drafted by 4 parallel agents, validated against files (all targets exist, anchors match, no em dashes, no duplicate links), and applied verbatim. Verified: biome clean, validate-links 0 errors, all edited pages and targets return 200, links render in the DOM.
Contributor
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Technical fix #4 from
SEO-OPPORTUNITIES.md(Days 0–14): internal-linking depth. Integration pages, cookbook recipes, and topic hubs were under-connected — all 27 integration pages linked no topic hub, 8 orphan integration pages linked nothing, and topic hubs were pure<RecipeGrid>components with zero outbound integration links.107 internal links woven into existing prose across 82 files:
## Related integrationssection after the recipe grid on 8 hubs (playwright, browser-use, computer-use, captchas, browser-automation, subagents, mobile, typed-output).How it was built
Proposals drafted by 4 parallel agents (integrations / recipes A–G / recipes H–Z / topic hubs), each returning exact insertions with anchor snippets. I merged and validated all 107 against the real files before applying:
8
insert-afterproposals glued onto preceding text on first apply (no leading whitespace); fixed each — 3 became their own paragraph after the recipe-link line, 5 got a sentence space.Verified
bun run check(Biome): cleanbun run validate-links: 0 errors