add trabbc to exclusions in NEMO#3282
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. ❌ Your project status has failed because you have indirect coverage changes. Learn more about Unexpected Coverage Changes and reasons for indirect coverage changes. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3282 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.95% 99.95% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 376 376
Lines 53545 53520 -25
==========================================
- Hits 53523 53497 -26
- Misses 22 23 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@addy419 I am happy merging this but it is concerning that we can't replicate the issue as from time to time I do check if the exclusions are still necessary in our end. Could you also let me know if you use any NEMO build keys or del_keys in your tests? |
|
@sergisiso The only difference I see is that I am using |
|
And do these also match? |
|
If it really is an issue with just one file and only on Grace-Hopper it's probably worth raising it with NVIDIA. |
|
@sergisiso I've made no changes to the upstream repo, so both |
|
@arporter Technically speaking, any |
|
Wouldn't |
|
@sergisiso Ah that, I am overriding the dependency with |
trabbc.f90producesfort2: terminated by signal 11on Nvidia Grace-Hopper (Isambard-AI Phase 2)