chore(config): make llm_slots profile-driven so slots track reviewed selections - #870
Conversation
…selections The pinned slot form did not track the model registry. The shared resolver deliberately RETAINS an unprofiled pin while the pinned model is still lifecycle=current, so slot1 stayed on gpt-5.4 and slot3 on codex-mini-latest even after the reviewed verifier-balanced selection advanced. Only slot2 followed the selection, and only because its pinned claude-sonnet-4-6 is absent from the registry entirely. Switch all three slots to `profile: verifier-balanced`, matching the form Workflows now ships. tools/llm_registry.py is already profile-aware, so no code change is needed here. This file is sync_mode: create_only in the Workflows manifest, so it can only be changed in this repo. Verified: freshness gate 0 blocking; against the current registry the slots resolve to today's selections (no behavior change), and against the advanced registry they resolve to gpt-5.6-terra / claude-sonnet-5 / openai/gpt-5, so the change is order-independent w.r.t. the registry sync. 13 LLM tests pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in: 5 minutes Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Comment |
Why
The pinned slot form does not track the model registry.
tools/llm_registry.pydeliberately retains an unprofiled pin while the pinned model is stilllifecycle: current, so an advancing reviewed selection was silently ignored. Probed against a registry whose selections had advanced:gpt-5.4gpt-5.4current→ retainedclaude-sonnet-4-6claude-opus-4-6codex-mini-latestcodex-mini-latestcurrent→ retainedOnly slot2 followed the reviewed selection, and only by accident of its pin being invalid.
What changed
All three slots switch to
profile: verifier-balanced— the formstranske/Workflowsnow ships. No code change: the syncedtools/llm_registry.pyis already profile-aware, and this repo has no local client fork.config/llm_slots.jsonissync_mode: create_onlyin the Workflows manifest ("repos may customize provider preferences"), so it can only be changed here.Verification
Order-independent w.r.t. stranske/Workflows#2852: correct against today's registry, and starts tracking the advanced selections as soon as the registry syncs.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code