chore(main): release 1.2.0 - #2409
Conversation
Automated Status SummaryHead SHA: ab1433f
Coverage Overview
Updated automatically; will refresh on subsequent CI/Docker completions. Keepalive checklistScopeDoc-rot was the audit's most pervasive defect class (most of §1/§4 findings were stale docs). Tasks
Acceptance criteria
|
|
Runner dispatch state for codex on PR #2409. Do not edit. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 182193ea09
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html). | ||
| Breaking changes are called out with a **BREAKING** marker and scheduled according to the policy in `COMPATIBILITY.md`. | ||
|
|
||
| ## [1.2.0](https://github.com/stranske/Workflows/compare/v1.1.2...v1.2.0) (2026-06-15) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Move carried Unreleased notes into 1.2.0
When this release is cut, the newly added 1.2.0 section becomes the release notes, but the existing curated ## [Unreleased] entries below still describe work that is already included in this v1.1.2...v1.2.0 diff (for example the floating v1 tag policy, compatibility policy, gate dispatch, Python 3.12, and auto-pilot fixes at lines 201-227). Consumers reading the v1.2.0 notes will miss that compatibility/deprecation guidance, so those bullets should be moved into this release section or trimmed to only post-1.2.0 work.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
446e360 to
05aae3c
Compare
05aae3c to
0aefea4
Compare
0aefea4 to
7883f8c
Compare
7883f8c to
09ccad4
Compare
09ccad4 to
0a46c2c
Compare
0a46c2c to
d7d65a9
Compare
d7d65a9 to
984cd6a
Compare
984cd6a to
5287bd6
Compare
5287bd6 to
5458189
Compare
3b6e837 to
8698128
Compare
8698128 to
7069084
Compare
7069084 to
30c8ddb
Compare
8080d2a to
30305b5
Compare
30305b5 to
bfa8012
Compare
bfa8012 to
bf5e933
Compare
bf5e933 to
062c01b
Compare
062c01b to
388dd47
Compare
388dd47 to
5a9152d
Compare
5a9152d to
9c414d6
Compare
9c414d6 to
9c88a0f
Compare
9c88a0f to
3fbcb8e
Compare
3fbcb8e to
999392f
Compare
Closes #2367
Automated Status Summary
Scope
Doc-rot was the audit's most pervasive defect class (most of §1/§4 findings were stale docs).
maint-66's monthly audit only carries a static "update docs" checklist; nothing systematically detects drift. This closes that gap on a monthly cadence.Tasks
Acceptance criteria
EXPECTED_NAMES+ both inventory docs;tests/workflows/green (24 passed).persist-credentials: false, scopedissues: write.[Docs Drift Audit]issue at a time.Head SHA: 999392f
Latest Runs: ✅ success — Gate
Required: gate: ✅ success