Skip to content

Conversation

@edgurgel
Copy link
Member

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Use custom number of peep partitions for default (ETS) instead of always using the number of online schedulers

@blacksmith-sh

This comment has been minimized.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 18, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 88.051% (+0.04%) from 88.016%
when pulling d9e845b on feat/peep-partitions
into 2249c06 on main.

@edgurgel edgurgel force-pushed the feat/peep-partitions branch from fef1b2b to a1e4e13 Compare December 18, 2025 19:27
@edgurgel edgurgel merged commit 05df771 into main Dec 18, 2025
6 checks passed
@edgurgel edgurgel deleted the feat/peep-partitions branch December 18, 2025 20:18
@kiwicopple
Copy link
Member

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.69.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants