docs: document userClaims and authKeyName in context#33
Merged
tomaspozo merged 1 commit intosupabase:mainfrom Apr 21, 2026
Merged
docs: document userClaims and authKeyName in context#33tomaspozo merged 1 commit intosupabase:mainfrom
tomaspozo merged 1 commit intosupabase:mainfrom
Conversation
tomaspozo
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2026
Member
tomaspozo
left a comment
tomaspozo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your contribution!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
docs update
What is the current behavior?
docs referenced
ctx.userinstead of definedctx.userClaimsfor JWT-derived claims in user auth modeWhat is the new behavior?
updated docs to correctly reference
ctx.userClaimsand optionalauthKeyName