Skip to content

Results

Mike Wright edited this page Sep 14, 2026 · 2 revisions

Results

Concise answers first; the evidence is one link deeper.

Question Current answer
Does top-1 routing increase stored capacity efficiently? Yes: 1.86 times the parameters at 1.02 times the active parameters per token
Do experts specialize? Yes at this synthetic scale: 0.61 against a 0.25 blind baseline
Is top-2 clearly better? No: better fit, first held-out MLPL answers, worse validation loss, twice the work
Does more training fix low-data behavior? No: doubling epochs at 120 examples worsens validation loss
Does more data help? Yes: eightfold data cuts validation loss by two thirds
Does sparse dispatch save work? Yes: 13,440 to 3,360 expert row evaluations, outputs exactly equal
Is sparse dispatch faster yet? No: dispatch bookkeeping outweighs the tiny matmuls skipped
Are cheap experts worth it? Sixteen rank-4 deltas cost half of four full experts and give the best validation losses so far
flowchart LR
  Q[Quality: exact match by family, validation loss] --> F[Findings]
  E[Economics: parameters, active per token, bytes] --> F
  R[Runtime: expert evaluations, latency, throughput] --> F
  D[Diagnostics: entropy, balance, KL, specialization] --> F
Loading

Pages

  • Current findings: seven claims, each as evidence, interpretation, and limitation
  • Resource economics: sizes, expert cost, stored versus active, quantization projections, residency, transfer estimates, each labeled measured, derived, or estimate
  • Quality: exact match by task family and validation loss, including the data-scale sweep
  • Generation benchmark: time to first token, throughput, tail latency
  • Full results table: one row per run
  • Docent results table: the campus docent runs, with the held-out paraphrase columns where value over the deterministic matcher is measured
  • Live demo verification: what was checked on the published page after each deploy

Headline sizes

Model Parameters Active per token Validation loss
DN01 dense 3,812 2,996 3.79
MX01 top-1 of 4 7,096 3,064 3.76
MX02 top-2 of 4 7,096 4,136 3.92
LD01 shared plus 16 deltas 6,132 3,396 3.46

See Experiments for the runs and Learn for the mechanisms.

Clone this wiki locally