v0.1.2

[0.1.2] - 2026-09-09

Found by installing 0.1.1 from PyPI into a clean environment and running it
against a project it had never seen. Every test before this one used the
source tree, which is not what anybody else gets.

Fixed

• A third of the tenancy suggestions proposed no change at all. re.sub
  returns the subject unchanged when the pattern does not match, and the
  pattern knows .all(), .filter(, .get( and .exclude(. A queryset that
  starts at a custom manager method - Profile.objects.for_user(request.user)

  • matches none of them, so the rewrite came back identical to the original
    and was printed as a diff whose - and + lines are the same text.

  On healthchecks, 13 of 37. Nothing was ever written, because --write only
  touches mechanical fixes and these are advisory, so the damage was to the
  report rather than to anybody's source - which does not make it a smaller
  lie. The finding stays, because the queryset really is unscoped; what goes
  is the pretence that there is a mechanical rewrite, replaced by a sentence
  saying where the scoping actually belongs. Found by running the published
  package against a project it had never seen.