Replies: 4 comments
|
Again a big thank you for the joy this new version brings. Regards, Harry |
0 replies
|
A big Thank You for the new release from my side too!!! :) Cheers! |
0 replies
|
It was really a small release motivated by a bug I had found in TO and +TO
where they would not fail if you tried to use them with something other
than a local or value but instead they would generate garbage code that
would crash when executed.
If anything, what I forgot to mention in the release notice was that I
added TURTLE::FGETXY and TURTLE::FSETXY to enable more fine-grained setting
of the Turtle position, a Lindenmayer system DSL, and a number of demos
including ones of L-systems, as I was in a hurry to get the fix out the
door.
Travis
… Message ID: <tabemann/zeptoforth/repo-discussions/298/comments/17882136@
github.com>
|
0 replies
|
Hi Travis,
it is not the size of the bug you fix or the feature you implement,
which counts in the first place.
It is your constant improvement and constant work of and at zeptoforth.
(choosing the correct english prepositions is more on the weaker side of
my already weak english...;)
I know a LOT of projects on github with bazillions of unsolved or uncommented
issues and tons of pull requests.
But not you and not Zeptoforth.
That is, what counts!
Cheers!
Meino
…On 08/03 11:00, tabemann wrote:
It was really a small release motivated by a bug I had found in TO and +TO
where they would not fail if you tried to use them with something other
than a local or value but instead they would generate garbage code that
would crash when executed.
If anything, what I forgot to mention in the release notice was that I
added TURTLE::FGETXY and TURTLE::FSETXY to enable more fine-grained setting
of the Turtle position, a Lindenmayer system DSL, and a number of demos
including ones of L-systems, as I was in a hurry to get the fix out the
door.
Travis
> Message ID: <tabemann/zeptoforth/repo-discussions/298/comments/17882136@
> github.com>
>
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#298 (comment)
You are receiving this because you commented.
Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This release:
toand+toso they raise an exception if the user attempts to apply them to something other than a local variable orvalue, where previously if the user applied them to such a hardfault would likely occur at runtime.extra/rp_common/picocalc_term_common.fswheretowas applied to something other than a local variable orvaluein an uncommon code path.This discussion was created from the release Bug-fix release 1.16.4.1.
All reactions