Skip to content

feat: Add logical plan serialization with placeholders in limit - #28

Merged
askalt merged 1 commit into
release-52.3.0from
a.karpenko/limit-placeholder-logical-plan-serialization
Aug 3, 2026
Merged

feat: Add logical plan serialization with placeholders in limit#28
askalt merged 1 commit into
release-52.3.0from
a.karpenko/limit-placeholder-logical-plan-serialization

Conversation

@karpenkoag

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Now the logical plan can be de/serialized if there are placeholders in the limit.

@karpenkoag
karpenkoag force-pushed the a.karpenko/limit-placeholder-logical-plan-serialization branch 2 times, most recently from 675b3db to e335efd Compare July 20, 2026 09:52
@karpenkoag
karpenkoag requested a review from askalt July 22, 2026 13:44
@LLDay
LLDay self-requested a review July 24, 2026 11:30
Comment thread datafusion/proto/proto/datafusion.proto Outdated
@karpenkoag
karpenkoag force-pushed the a.karpenko/limit-placeholder-logical-plan-serialization branch 2 times, most recently from fa7a01b to 9793b9a Compare July 28, 2026 15:37
Comment thread datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs Outdated
Comment thread datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs Outdated
Comment thread datafusion/proto/src/logical_plan/mod.rs
Comment thread datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs
Comment thread datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs Outdated
Comment thread datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs Outdated
@askalt

askalt commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The patch looks as almost done. Suggest to create a PR to the upstream.

Now the logical plan can be de/serialized if there
are placeholders in the limit.
@karpenkoag
karpenkoag force-pushed the a.karpenko/limit-placeholder-logical-plan-serialization branch from 9793b9a to a820e52 Compare July 31, 2026 12:35

@LLDay LLDay left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the patch!

@askalt
askalt merged commit 7eb9132 into release-52.3.0 Aug 3, 2026
71 of 81 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants