v0.1.162

✨ Features

• the portfolio omits the repo that carries the loop it claims to run (7b129a2)

🐛 Fixes

• the bar claimed a gate is blocking, contradicting a file written yesterday (8ccf477)
• the card described a loop with no human in it (b9f96d1)

Full changelog: v0.1.161...v0.1.162

v0.1.161

🐛 Fixes

• moving the nav entry alone put the same word on two destinations (40d8ba2)
• the navbar entry named after the catalog landed on the shortlist of it (6be5355)

⚙️ CI & chores

• the border assertion looked like active-state coverage and was not (9e973e5)

Full changelog: v0.1.160...v0.1.161

v0.1.160

✨ Features

• back the strip's Spring Boot and Security with real skills (c3f324e)
• the skills list was a plateau — every AI item at one level, saying nothing (dbf5665)
• Loop Engineering becomes Harness Engineering in the CV (c5c89bc)

🐛 Fixes

• the Observability comment certified four of its six items (efe32db)

📝 Documentation

• the strip's rule cites profile.ts, and that citation needed the item-vs-heading line (f543986)

Full changelog: v0.1.159...v0.1.160

v0.1.159

✨ Features

• the strip said "Subjects" and listed things the site never writes about (ee02a95)

🐛 Fixes

• two coined Engineering tokens side by side read as one hedged idea (25b8a54)
• the en strip was asserted nowhere, and a rename orphaned a live E2E locator (8c65015)

♻️ Refactoring

• one list, both editions — and the locale type went with the rule (2c11bc1)

Full changelog: v0.1.158...v0.1.159

v0.1.158

🐛 Fixes

• granting docs/ wholesale gave away the CV — third over-general claim in this file (0561938)
• the notice said "everything else in that directory is MIT" about a directory it had just split (c345812)
• the notice promised two carve-outs and named one, and quoted a page that does not say it (f36b4cf)

⚙️ CI & chores

• GitHub could not classify the licence, so it told readers nothing (6c428f1)

Full changelog: v0.1.157...v0.1.158

v0.1.157

🐛 Fixes

• renaming the workflows orphaned a link on a page readers see (fade47b)

📝 Documentation

• jobs named after their command, and the iac split cuts on credentials (32b88b5)
• the document is the target now, not a history of how we got here (0a8c390)
• the three pre-merge workflows are named after the directories they gate (d09f812)
• per-job path filters, and the criterion is not the directory (2b6f3f6)
• redraw the target on the owner's structure — one deploy workflow, ordered jobs (bb6ff0f)
• the target design goes first, as one drawing of the whole lifecycle (1865a0e)
• add the proposed shape, marked as a proposal (832feaa)
• map the pipeline where the confusion happens (993bd6a)

⚙️ CI & chores

• rebuild the pipeline to the approved design — four workflows, named after what they guard (b9ef46d)

Full changelog: v0.1.156...v0.1.157

v0.1.156

Other

• Revert "ci: a red post-deploy smoke was a colour nobody acted on" (b3ba184)

Full changelog: v0.1.155...v0.1.156

v0.1.155

🐛 Fixes

• force_destroy was armed on the bucket holding the live site (2be5544)

📝 Documentation

• record why the environment predicate was fiction, not just wrong (fa5cc5c)

Full changelog: v0.1.154...v0.1.155

v0.1.154

📝 Documentation

• the record said "exactly three" and "and also this" in the same table (cd862fb)

Full changelog: v0.1.153...v0.1.154

v0.1.153

🐛 Fixes

• the articles subline promised a format instead of a payoff (00ed86f)

📝 Documentation

• the reason I gave for dropping the subline was weaker than the real one (df93ff7)

Full changelog: v0.1.152...v0.1.153