Repository navigation
Curved IFA efficiency calculation doesn't seem to match S11 results #484
|
Hi, I am trying to simulate a curved IFA on a circular PCB with a resonant frequency of 2.45GHz. I used the FreeCAD-openEMS-exporter tool to generate the model and used their IFA example as reference. I am able to simulate the antenna successfully and the S11 performance is showing -36dB at the resonant frequency (2.466GHz). I also wanted to see the antenna efficiency to I copied the efficiency calculation code from the packaged inverted_f.m example (https://github.com/thliebig/openEMS/blob/master/matlab/examples/antennas/inverted_f.m). However, while the S11 and impedance graphs show a close match, the efficiency is only ~45%. Meanwhile, the IFA example has efficiency of 81% and S11 magnitude of -31dB. What is could be causing the low efficiency result on my curved IFA simulation? For reference I am using:
Files: Thanks in advance for your help. |
Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
|
Hi, So I just increase mesh lines approximatiley 3x to make mesh finer Then after simulation I got results:
But thing is that you put there top and bottom gnd but inverted f antenna doesn't use bottom gnd ONLY TOP, so this are result when I commented bottom gnd and added 3 lines in Z for substrate So I did:
Attaching modified script. |
|
if this solved your problem please close this issue to have it properly categorized on this forum (there should be button which to close which is possible just to author of issue), thanks |
|
Hi, for curiosity I tried to rework your model into cylindrical coordinates since I never really used them in openEMS and I made some support for them into my addon but never really tested them on many examples. Simulation files below. |










Hi,
I looked at your model and efficiency is low because you have to move antenna fine mesh to have higher priority than gnd and make mesh more fine to connect it with top gnd since now it's disconnected when you open debug PEC in paraview.
This is your coarse mesh where inverted F is disconnected from top gnd.
So I just increase mesh lines approximatiley 3x to make mesh finer
Then after simulation I got results:
But thing is that you put there top and bottom gnd but inverted f antenna doesn't use bottom gnd ONLY TOP, so this are result …