Added support for univariate box plots with no x aesthetic.
#2292
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #2110.
This now works:
Which would essentially be the equivalent of this, without the mapped x-aesthetic:
Tried a few approaches, but this is the cleanest way I've found so far. I think it looks OK to have the
xlocation be at 0 without an axis label; user can always map the x aesthetic if more fine-grained adjustments are required. Ideally, I think the univariate boxplot would look something like this, where the x-axis is essentially removed/treated like a discrete scale. However, I couldn't find a clean way of changing it from a continuous scale from within the geom/stat ggprotos without hard coding the exceptions into the layer building process.