Skip to content

v0.7.1 — new-mission 收尾報告|wrap-up report

Choose a tag to compare

@tingyulu tingyulu released this 28 Aug 23:37
· 10 commits to main since this release

繁中

new-mission 補上收尾那一半:任務執行結束(做完、中止、失敗都算)交一份對照計畫的收尾報告——【計畫】【執行過程】【成果】【誠實帳】【落點】五格,明講什麼做了、什麼沒做、什麼沒驗、什麼是猜的。

  • 落點先核可:報告放哪,在計畫階段的【產出】格就寫明;沒有落點就對話交付並明說「報告未落檔」(這不是降級,是誠實)。
  • 隨做隨記:執行中每完成一步當下記一行「做了什麼、證據在哪」,【執行過程】從記錄長出來、不靠回憶補。
  • 比例原則:小任務壓成五行,但五格不砍;判準沒過或有計畫外狀況就不得壓縮。
  • 與 damage-report 一頭一尾:五問是審查、報告是載體。五格自足,沒裝姊妹 skill 不降級。
  • 簡版 prompts/new-mission.md(免安裝、可貼 custom instructions)同步更新。

設計稿經跨模型二審後定稿(6 條採納、3 條附理由駁回)。

English

new-mission gets its second half: when execution ends (finished, aborted, or failed), it now closes with a wrap-up report checked against the plan — five cells: Plan / Process / Results / Honest ledger / Location — explicitly stating what was done, what wasn't, what went unverified, and what is inference.

  • Location pre-approved: where the report lands is written into the plan's Output cell up front; with no location, it's delivered in chat with an explicit "report not persisted" note (honesty, not degradation).
  • Log as you go: each completed step gets a one-line "what was done → where's the evidence" record; the Process cell grows from that log, not from memory.
  • Proportionality: small tasks compress to five lines but never drop cells; no compression when criteria failed or off-plan events occurred.
  • Pairs with damage-report: the five questions audit, the report carries. The five cells are self-sufficient — no degradation without the sibling skill.
  • The install-free lite prompt prompts/new-mission.en.md is updated in sync.

Design reviewed by a second AI model before landing (6 adoptions, 3 rejections with reasons).