|
I have a protocol which is implemented very nicely with These payloads are For such protocols, is there a way to retain the convenience of If not, is there any non-breaking way that this could be supported? Ignorantly spit-balling here: I suspect that the the As a work-around, if any of the above is unfeasible: How costly, and foot-gunny, would it be to deconstruct the |
Replies: 1 comment
|
You should probably open code |
You should probably open code
Framedin your codebase to make the modifications you need. I wouldn't try to use the existing abstraction if it becomes too hard to do so.