Remove UnPack as a dependency and use SimpleUnPack in docs
#103
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since
UnPack.@unpackis based onunpack(x, Val(key))it can lead to a lot of undesired specializations, see e.g. SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#1893. Therefore I put together a more lightweight macro that just callsgetpropertyin https://github.com/devmotion/SimpleUnPack.jl (by design, it has less features than UnPack.jl).Initially I wanted to replace UnPack with SimpleUnPack in this package but then I noticed that apparently UnPack.@unpack is only used in the docs and not needed in the package itself anymore. It seems it was only used in the part that was moved to LogDensityProblemsAD. Hence I removed UnPack from the package and the tests, and only switched to SimpleUnPack in the docs.