docs(rfc): qualified identifier for the rootless spike + fix the LPI back-link

[LukasWodka]

Summary

Two small fixes to docs/rfcs/0001-rootless-spike.md, both consequences of RFC numbers being assigned per repo — a bare 0001 currently names four different documents across the org.

1. Qualified identifier. The header now states RFC-CLIENT-0001, in the bold-label style this document already uses, and carries an explicit Draft status.
2. Fixed the RFC: back-link. It pointed at ./0001-least-privilege-install.md — a link that is broken on develop today and that collided with this very file's own number.

The within-repo collision

client had a genuine collision, not just a cross-repo one: the least-privilege-install RFC in #369 was also numbered 0001, the same number as the rootless spike already on develop.

That one is being renumbered to 0002-least-privilege-install.md (RFC-CLIENT-0002) in #369, so the back-link here now targets 0002. 0002 was the next free number in this repo.

No merge-order requirement. The link is dead either way until #369 merges — it is dead on develop right now. If this lands first it stays dead for the gap; if #369 lands first it resolves immediately.

The stray duplicate file

docs/rfcs/0001-rootless-spike 2.md — a macOS copy artifact — was never committed to git. It existed only as an untracked file in a local working tree (git ls-files and git log --all both return nothing for it).

Verdict: it is a byte-for-byte duplicate of 0001-rootless-spike.md, not an inferior or diverged copy — both are 6842 bytes with md5 6544a40cd86f84940725bc8bcad29c3c, matching the copy on origin/develop exactly. Its only difference was a -rw------- permission bit. It has been deleted from the working tree; no repository change was required, which is why this PR shows no deletion.

Public-repo note

client is public. The added text names only tracebloc/backend and issue numbers, both of which this document already referenced on develop. No customer names, hostnames or internal-only detail.

Companion PRs

Repo	PR	Contents
backend	tracebloc/backend#1259	the scheme + the org-wide index (docs/rfcs/README.md, private repo by design)
cli	tracebloc/cli#412	qualified IDs in the three cli RFC headers
client	#369	RFC-CLIENT-0002: the renumber, status Accepted, un-drafted

In-flight: tracebloc/backend#1146 adds backend/docs/rfcs/0002-platform-cost-autoscale-architecture.md. It will need the same header treatment (RFC-BACKEND-0002) when it merges — it is already listed in the index.

Test plan

Docs-only; no chart, script or workflow touched. Verified the document renders and that the only link change is the intended 0001 → 0002 repoint.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

---

Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only header and link updates with no runtime, chart, or workflow changes.

Overview
Updates docs/rfcs/0001-rootless-spike.md so cross-repo RFC numbering is unambiguous: the header now declares RFC-CLIENT-0001, tells readers not to cite a bare "RFC 0001", and points at the org index in tracebloc/backend.

Status is explicitly Draft (prepended to the existing status line). The RFC: back-link no longer targets ./0001-least-privilege-install.md (broken and same-number collision); it now links RFC-CLIENT-0002 at ./0002-least-privilege-install.md, aligned with the companion renumber in #369.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 60ee638. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[LukasWodka]

👋 Heads-up — Code review queue is at 38 / 30

Above the WIP limit. The team convention is to review existing PRs before opening new work.

Open PRs currently in Code review (oldest first):

• .github#64 — fix(closure-router): add GH_TOKEN to closing-PR lookup so issues mirror their closing PR's Status · author: @LukasWodka · no reviewer assigned
• .github#65 — feat(quality): shared code-quality reusable workflow + house-rules checker · author: @LukasWodka · no reviewer assigned
• .github#66 — ci(actionlint): lint this repo's own workflows + clear the 29 pre-existing findings · author: @LukasWodka · no reviewer assigned
• .github#67 — fix(closure-router): a manual issue close must not invent a deploy state · author: @LukasWodka · no reviewer assigned
• averaging-service#207 — Promote develop → staging · author: @shujaatTracebloc · no reviewer assigned
• backend#1201 — docs(rfc): Data spaces & federated dataset composition (draft) · author: @LukasWodka · no reviewer assigned
• backend#1217 — docs(rfc): Dataset integrity & score reproducibility (draft) · author: @LukasWodka · no reviewer assigned
• backend#1228 — Promote develop → staging · author: @shujaatTracebloc · reviewer: @saadqbal
• backend#1244 — fix(experiments): surface save-time failures as 5xx + guard new NOT NULL columns · author: @LukasWodka · reviewer: @saqlainsyed007
• backend#1251 — docs(bugbot): add .cursor/BUGBOT.md project context (#930) · author: @LukasWodka · no reviewer assigned

Pull from review before opening new work. (This is a nudge from the kanban WIP check, not a block.)

[LukasWodka]

bugbot run

[cursor]

✅ Bugbot reviewed your changes and found no new issues!

Comment @cursor review or bugbot run to trigger another review on this PR

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 60ee638. Configure here.}