docs: BUGBOT.md rule — a secretless code-quality caller is correct (backend#1526) - #596
Merged
Conversation
…ce (backend#1526) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fleet half of the RFC-BACKEND-1405 Q5 unwind (tracebloc/backend#1526). Q5 was answered 2026-08-04 via tracebloc/rfcs#11: the shared
code-quality.ymlreusable references no secrets by contract, so secretless callees carry nosecrets:line at all — and if the reusable ever gains a secret, callers switch to explicit per-secret passing, neversecrets: inherit..cursor/BUGBOT.md— appended one bullet as the last item of the "Known non-issues — do not flag" section: acode-quality-caller.ymlthat passes nosecrets:line is correct, not an omission; Bugbot should instead flag the addition ofsecrets: inheriton this caller. No other lines touched.This repo's
code-quality-caller.ymlis already secretless ondevelop, so no workflow change is needed here.Part of tracebloc/backend#1526
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Note
Low Risk
Documentation-only change to
.cursor/BUGBOT.mdwith no runtime or CI behavior changes.Overview
Documents RFC-BACKEND-1405 Q5 (backend#1526) for automated review: a
code-quality-caller.ymlwith nosecrets:block is correct because the sharedcode-quality.ymlreusable does not use secrets.The new Known non-issues bullet tells Bugbot not to flag a missing
secrets:line as an omission, and to flagsecrets: inheritif someone adds it on this caller. Callers should use explicit per-secret passing if the reusable ever needs secrets.No workflow edits in this PR—the repo’s caller is already secretless on
develop.Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit f7004cf. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.