feat(codex): add STANDARD as an externally issued technical standard - #539
Merged
Conversation
…(transitrix-hq#318) Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2 tasks
transitrix
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2026
This was referenced Sep 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implements
THQ-318: Codex has no TYPE for an externally-issued technical standard
Decision
Strategist decision 2026-08-25: TYPE is
STANDARD, issued by a standards-developing organisation (ISO, IEC, IEEE, ANSI, NIST-as-SDO, DIN, BSI, PCI SSC, and peers).Discriminator: LAW/REGULATION are issued under a statute; INTERNAL_STANDARD/POLICY/PRINCIPLE are self-issued; STANDARD is issued by an external standards body.
Changes
intlno longer reserved (14-codex.md §1.1)Scope
Codex notation and validators only. Studio, DSM, and REQUIREMENT
originchange are out of scope (recorded in hq#318 comments).🤖 Generated with Claude Code