import-url: add directories to examples

[efiop]

#2894

• ❗ Have you followed the guidelines in the Contributing to DVC list?

• 📖 Check this box if this PR does not require documentation updates, or if it does and you have created a separate PR in dvc.org with such updates (or at least opened an issue about it in that repo). Please link below to your PR (or issue) in the dvc.org repo.

• ❌ Have you checked DeepSource, CodeClimate, and other sanity checks below? We consider their findings recommendatory and don't expect everything to be addressed. Please review them carefully and fix those that actually improve code or fix bugs.

Thank you for the contribution - we'll try to review it as soon as possible. 🙏

[efiop]

For the record: windows test failing because of unrelated issues with chocolatey.

[jorgeorpinel]

• Check this box if this PR does not require documentation updates...

Why is this checked? :P Perhaps I haven't noticed the PR on dvc.org? Otherwise, I also approve these changes.

[shcheklein]

@jorgeorpinel bc ... or at least opened an issue about it in that repo :)

[jorgeorpinel]

You conveniently omit

Please link below to your PR (or issue) in the dvc.org repo.

@shcheklein 😋

OK, found it: treeverse/dvc.org/issues/841

[shcheklein]

You conveniently omit

@jorgeorpinel only bc it's referenced and is visible here already:

[jorgeorpinel]

That is a link from the issue back to this PR. I think we mean a link to the issue in this PR? (In the description of the PR in fact.) Would be much more visible I think. I mean, there's many of these automated thingies in PRs and I doubt people always pay attention to them. E.g.:

Just trying to understand the meaning of that sentence in the PULL_REQUEST template.

[jorgeorpinel]

p.s. Obviously this is no longer relevant in this case but (and I was mostly messing around) but it's an interesting question for future reference actually.

[efiop]

@jorgeorpinel Will try to place it explicitly, thanks for the heads up. 🙂

[shcheklein]

Yeah, I think 95% of the job and value is to have the proper ticket created. I agree though that an explicit link in the PR/issue is better and improves readability. For me it was usually fine to see a connected issue in the PR - it serves both ways anyway.

[jorgeorpinel]

Thanks guys! Sorry to seem so strict, wasn't the intention originally 😬 obviously some times these small things slip and its totally fine.