Skip to content

Addressing RFC8776-bis WG LC comments#291

Merged
italobusi merged 12 commits intotsaad-dev:masterfrom
italobusi:8776-bis-13
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

Addressing RFC8776-bis WG LC comments#291
italobusi merged 12 commits intotsaad-dev:masterfrom
italobusi:8776-bis-13

Conversation

@italobusi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@italobusi italobusi commented Sep 2, 2024

Addressing additional WG LC comments:

@italobusi italobusi marked this pull request as draft September 2, 2024 16:49
@italobusi italobusi marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2024 23:03
@italobusi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

italobusi commented Sep 13, 2024

@tsaad-dev : do we need the state container to contain only the signaled-bandwidth leaf?

What about the following change:

OLD

    +-- packet-bandwidth
       +-- specification-type?   te-bandwidth-requested-type
       ............................................................
       +-- class-type?           te-types:te-ds-class
       +-- state
          +-- signaled-bandwidth?   te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps

NEW

    +-- packet-bandwidth
       +-- specification-type?   te-bandwidth-requested-type
       ............................................................
       +-- class-type?           te-types:te-ds-class
       +-- signaled-bandwidth?   te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps

Comment thread ietf-te-packet-types.yang Outdated
leaf specification-type {
type te-bandwidth-requested-type;
description
"The method used for setting the bandwidth, either
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NEW:
The bandwidth specification type, either explicit or automatically computed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in 4b4632c

Comment thread ietf-te-packet-types.yang Outdated
Diffserv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering,
Section 4.3.1";
}
container state {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we still use "state" container? Also, shouldn't this be config False?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed.

See also: #291 (comment)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in 4b4632c

Comment thread ietf-te-packet-types.yang Outdated
units "bits/second";
description
"Available bandwith value.";
"Bandwidth value for Packet links.";
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/Packet links/packet TE links/

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in 4b4632c

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@tsaad-dev tsaad-dev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please address couple of small nits

@italobusi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

2024-09-27 TE Call

Agreed to remove the state container and make the signaled-bandwidth config false (see also #291 (comment))

@tsaad-dev : do we need the state container to contain only the signaled-bandwidth leaf?

What about the following change:

OLD

    +-- packet-bandwidth
       +-- specification-type?   te-bandwidth-requested-type
       ............................................................
       +-- class-type?           te-types:te-ds-class
       +-- state
          +-- signaled-bandwidth?   te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps

NEW

    +-- packet-bandwidth
       +-- specification-type?   te-bandwidth-requested-type
       ............................................................
       +-- class-type?           te-types:te-ds-class
       +-- signaled-bandwidth?   te-packet-types:bandwidth-kbps

@italobusi italobusi merged commit 706deee into tsaad-dev:master Sep 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

3 participants