chore(ci): update golang

[tuannvm]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated Go toolchain to a newer patch release.
  • Expanded CI with additional verification, security scanning, test coverage, and build verification steps for PRs and non-main branches.
  • Added automated checks and guidance to detect and flag outdated language/library/tool versions during inline reviews.
  • Introduced CI linting configuration to standardize static analysis.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Bumped Go toolchain in go.mod to 1.24.9, added/updated GitHub Actions workflows (cursor.yml, build.yml, test.yml) including version-checking and multi-job CI (verify/security/test/build), and added .golangci.yml linter configuration. No API or exported symbol changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Toolchain go.mod	Updated Go toolchain line from 1.24.0 → 1.24.9. No module requirements or indirect dependency edits.
CI: new comprehensive workflows .github/workflows/build.yml, .github/workflows/test.yml	Added build.yml implementing verify, security, test, and build jobs (SBOM, Trivy, govulncheck, coverage, build examples). Updated test.yml Go version to 1.24.9 (was 1.25) and adjusted environment.
CI: review guidance & version checks .github/workflows/cursor.yml	Expanded cursor workflow to fetch/compare declared versions (go.mod, package.json, Dockerfile, workflows), flag outdated/deprecated items, and introduce dedicated inline-comment categorization for version issues.
Linting config .golangci.yml	Added GolangCI-Lint config (version: "2", run timeout 5m, modules-download-mode readonly, default linters).

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  actor PR as "Pull Request"
  participant Cursor as "cursor.yml (review)"
  participant Verifier as "Version Lookup Service"
  participant CI_Verify as "verify job"
  participant CI_Security as "security job"
  participant CI_Test as "test job"
  participant CI_Build as "build job"
  participant Reporter as "Inline Comments / SARIF / Artifacts"

  PR->>Cursor: Trigger review workflow
  Cursor->>Verifier: Fetch latest versions for declared files
  Verifier-->>Cursor: Return latest stable versions
  Cursor->>Reporter: Post version comparison (outdated / ok / deprecated)

  PR->>CI_Verify: Trigger verify job
  CI_Verify->>Reporter: Lint / module tidy / go setup results

  CI_Verify->>CI_Security: enable security (depends)
  CI_Security->>Reporter: govulncheck, Trivy SARIF, upload SBOM

  CI_Verify->>CI_Test: enable tests (depends)
  CI_Test->>Reporter: Run tests, upload coverage

  CI_Security->>CI_Build: allow build (depends)
  CI_Build->>Reporter: Build verification, example binaries artifact

Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes

• Review focus:
  • .github/workflows/build.yml for correctness of job dependencies, conditional execution, and artifact/SARIF uploads.
  • .github/workflows/cursor.yml for network/version-fetch logic, caching, rate limits, and comment categorization rules.
  • .github/workflows/test.yml to ensure Go version change doesn't break matrix/other steps.
  • .golangci.yml for linter settings and timeouts.
  • go.mod toolchain line (confirm intent).

Poem

🐰 I hopped through lines of CI and code,
Swapped a toolchain cap upon my road,
I sniffed the versions, left a thoughtful note,
Built carrots into artifacts in my tote. 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title "chore(ci): update golang" directly and specifically describes the primary change in this pull request—updating the Go toolchain version in go.mod from 1.24.0 to 1.24.9. The title appropriately categorizes this as a maintenance chore and correctly indicates it relates to CI/build infrastructure. While the PR also includes modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow file (cursor.yml) that enhance version checking, the title accurately captures the main change, and the instructions note that titles need not cover every detail of the changeset.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c798db and 565f318.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
• .golangci.yml (1 hunks)

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

Found a blocking issue: go.mod references Go 1.24.9 which is not released.

[github-actions]

⚠️ Logic Go 1.24.9 hasn't been released, so CI can't install this toolchain. Please stick with a published Go version until 1.24 ships.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/cursor.yml (1)

93-93: Emoji taxonomy is complete; outdated/deprecated issues are intentionally non-blocking.

The emoji definitions at line 93 are comprehensive and cover all categories referenced in the analysis scope. The blocking logic (lines 106–107) intentionally excludes 📦 Outdated Version and 🔄 Deprecated, treating them as actionable warnings rather than hard blockers. This is a reasonable posture for a chore-level workflow, but if the team expects outdated versions to also block critical PRs, consider documenting this design choice or extending the blocking condition to include || with 📦 severity.

If outdated versions should also block PRs (e.g., high-severity outdated language toolchain), the blocking logic at lines 106–107 can be extended:

- if BLOCKING_REVIEW is true and you posted any 🚨 or 🔒 issues
+ if BLOCKING_REVIEW is true and you posted any 🚨, 🔒, or (optionally) 📦 issues

Otherwise, the current design is sound.

Also applies to: 104-107

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 584e68c and 2c798db.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/cursor.yml (2 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

.github/workflows/cursor.yml (3)

54-55: Objectives 3 and 4 are well-scoped and aligned with the PR's intent.

The new version verification objective (line 54) and comment format guideline (line 55) directly support the chore of updating golang and keeping dependencies current. Both fit naturally into the workflow.

---

61-66: IMPORTANT section provides comprehensive version-checking guidance.

The list of file types (go.mod, package.json, requirements.txt, Dockerfile, Actions workflows) is practical and covers the common version-bearing files. The instruction to search the web for latest stable versions is clear and actionable, and the emphasis on comparing found versions with PR-embedded versions ensures outdated versions are caught.

---

84-85: Analysis scope extensions are consistent with version-checking instructions.

Lines 84–85 align well with the IMPORTANT section (lines 61–66) by extending the analysis scope to include outdated versions and deprecated patterns. The instruction to use web search for versions and documentation for deprecations is consistent with the guidance provided earlier.

[github-advanced-security]

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.