Skip to content

Update sbt-typelevel to 0.4.15#65

Closed
typelevel-steward[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
update/sbt-typelevel-0.4.15
Closed

Update sbt-typelevel to 0.4.15#65
typelevel-steward[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
update/sbt-typelevel-0.4.15

Conversation

@typelevel-steward
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates org.typelevel:sbt-typelevel from 0.4.13 to 0.4.15.
GitHub Release Notes - Version Diff

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.typelevel", artifactId = "sbt-typelevel" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "@monthly" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.typelevel", artifactId = "sbt-typelevel" }
}]

labels: sbt-plugin-update, early-semver-minor, semver-spec-patch, commit-count:n:2

@satorg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

satorg commented Sep 23, 2022

Not clear why it failed last time. I tried this branch locally and it builds just fine.
Can we give it another try please?

@satorg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

satorg commented Sep 23, 2022

Ah ok – disregard please, it cannot find literally v1.0.3 for sjs, but seems it does not exist indeed 🤔

UPD. yes, it looks like v1.0.3 never was published, but mima wants to check against v1.0.3.

@satorg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

satorg commented Sep 24, 2022

#67 should resolve the issues.

@typelevel-steward
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded by #70.

@typelevel-steward typelevel-steward Bot deleted the update/sbt-typelevel-0.4.15 branch October 13, 2022 03:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant