Skip to content

Issue 666: Fix typo; add class-vs-instance clarifying remarks - #685

Merged
eoghanscasey merged 2 commits into
developfrom
Feature-Issue-666
Jul 22, 2026
Merged

Issue 666: Fix typo; add class-vs-instance clarifying remarks#685
eoghanscasey merged 2 commits into
developfrom
Feature-Issue-666

Conversation

@ajnelson-nist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks to @plbt5 for finding this in CASE website review.

This PR will not require committee review.

No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

References:
* casework/casework.github.io#349
* #666

Reported-by: Paul Brandt <paul@brandt.name>
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
@ajnelson-nist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This PR is ready for review and merge.

@ajnelson-nist
ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as ready for review July 21, 2026 18:46
@ajnelson-nist
ajnelson-nist requested a review from a team July 21, 2026 18:46
No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

References:
* casework/casework.github.io#349 (comment)
* #666

Requested-by: Paul Brandt <paul@brandt.name>
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist changed the title Issue 666: Fix typo Issue 666: Fix typo; add class-vs-instance clarifying remarks Jul 22, 2026
@ajnelson-nist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@plbt5 , this PR now covers the typo you found and a clarification you suggested. If you find the changes satisfactory, it would be good for you to review and merge.

@eoghanscasey eoghanscasey left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Corrected PR Approved.

@eoghanscasey
eoghanscasey merged commit 9001781 into develop Jul 22, 2026
1 check passed
ajnelson-nist added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2026
These should have been committed as part of PR 685.

References:
* #666
* #685

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add uco-action:Technique class and associated properties to enhance UCO's ability to better represent technique-oriented community efforts

2 participants