Skip to content

v1.0.2 — Concept DOI is primary citation anchor

Choose a tag to compare

View all tags
@ulissesflores ulissesflores released this 18 May 20:41
· 1 commit to main since this release
v1.0.2
b0bdeeb

v1.0.2 — Concept DOI is now the primary citation anchor

Patch release — Zenodo automatically maintains a concept DOI alongside
each versioned DOI. v1.0.2 makes the concept DOI the primary citation
anchor across CITATION.cff, both whitepapers' status blocks, the rebuilt
PDFs, and the top-level README.

Publisher: Codex Hash Research Laboratory · São Paulo, Brazil
Author: Ulisses Flores · CTO & Chief Researcher
Concept DOI (always latest): 10.5281/zenodo.20276631
Versioned DOI (this release): auto-minted by Zenodo within ~10 minutes

The DOI map for this work

What DOI When to use
Concept (always latest) 10.5281/zenodo.20276631 Default for citations — ages gracefully
v1.0.0 (specific snapshot) 10.5281/zenodo.20276632 Pin a reviewer audit to v1.0.0's exact bytes
v1.0.1 (specific snapshot) 10.5281/zenodo.20276855 Pin to v1.0.1 (PDFs with embedded DOI)
v1.0.2 (specific snapshot) minted automatically on this release publish Pin to v1.0.2 (concept DOI integrated everywhere)

All four DOIs resolve. Concept DOI is preferred for citations because
a citation written today to 20276631 still resolves to the most recent
version in 2027, 2030, 2040 — no citation drift.

What changed since v1.0.1

CITATION.cff

  • identifiers[] now lists the concept DOI first.
  • Each versioned DOI (v1.0.0, v1.0.1) is kept as an additional entry
    for use cases that need to pin a specific snapshot (reproducibility,
    reviewer audits).
  • preferred-citation.doi is the concept DOI.

paper/asp-preprint.md and paper/iron-law-11.md

  • Status block now shows the concept DOI with
    (concept · always resolves to latest version) note.
  • Both PDFs rebuilt so the concept DOI appears in their rendered title
    block.

Top-level README.md

"Whitepapers" section linked to the concept DOI instead of the v1.0.0
versioned DOI.

What stays the same

The empirical claim (60.0% silent-refusal rate; 95% CI 46.5%–73.6%; N=50
pre-registered), the methodology, the protocol, the source code, and
all evidence files are unchanged. This is a citation-hygiene patch.

For the headline finding, methodology, citation block, reproducibility
instructions, license terms, and acknowledgments, see the v1.0.0
release notes.

Cite this work (preferred)

Flores, U. (2026). ASP — Anticipating Shadow Points.
Codex Hash Research Laboratory Whitepaper Series.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20276631

Mantra (still holds)

Not a bit of unnecessary file at the Zenodo-minted tag.
Citations age gracefully via the concept DOI.

Assets 5
Loading