Skip to content

Conversation

@eemeli
Copy link
Collaborator

@eemeli eemeli commented Jan 15, 2024

As discussed in #570 (comment), the hourCycle option is also valid when using the timeStyle or dateStyle options of :datetime.

I suggest this is considered as an editorial change and fast-tracked.

@eemeli eemeli added functions Issue pertains to the default function set fast-track Editorial change permitted to use fast-track merge rules editorial Issue is non-normative labels Jan 15, 2024
@aphillips
Copy link
Member

Why not stuff this into #570? Also, we should probably fix the upstream decisions about the default registry.

@eemeli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

eemeli commented Jan 15, 2024

Because they're separate changes, and I wasn't sure if we had consensus on adding :date and :time.

@aphillips
Copy link
Member

We don't have consensus on :date and :time. Let's see if we can get there in the call?

@aphillips aphillips merged commit c3ee018 into main Jan 15, 2024
@aphillips aphillips deleted the hour-cycle branch January 15, 2024 18:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

editorial Issue is non-normative fast-track Editorial change permitted to use fast-track merge rules functions Issue pertains to the default function set

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants