-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
Port ABNF changes and fomatting to syntax document #657
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
aphillips
merged 2 commits into
unicode-org:main
from
alerque:update-abnf-snippets-in-spec
Feb 16, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are already listed elsewhere in
syntax.md. Is there a reason to bring them here, rather than keeping them in their current places?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not seeing this? Where are the productions doubled in @alerque's text?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
quoted-charis currently under Literals right afterquoted, andreserved-charunder Reserved Annotations right afterreserved-body. The proposed change moves their listings from those places (which are their only users) to here.As is, their meaning is obvious from context. If they're moved here, then we should add some text here explaining what they are.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Those definitions moved in the abnf source too, and I found their new/current locations much easier to grok than the old ones the syntax explanations were using because they are now grouped with more related context with other similar definitions.
If consensuses is that isn't a good change they can go back to their original places, but the abnf snippets will no longer be all blocks where the whole snippet comes from a contiguous bit of source. Having all the snippets match some contiguous bit from the original file makes it quite a bit easier to verify that it is in sync.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As we do not intend to make further syntax changes, mirroring such changes in
syntax.mdas well as the ANBF should not need to be done later.I have a weak preference for keeping these as they currently are, but I'm fine to go with whatever most people think.