Disallow U+3000 as the last character of a reserved-body. #727
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In all places where a 'reserved-body' can occur:
A syntax ambiguity exists, because - as reported in #721 and #725 - a U+3000 character can occur as the last character of a 'reserved-body' (via a 'reserved-char') and also as first character of whitespace ('s' nonterminal).
According to the principles explained in #725, it is not desired that a 'reserved-body' ends with a U+3000 character; rather, the U+3000 character is meant to be interpreted as part of the following whitespace.
Test cases (written with \u escapes, for legibility): For reserved-statement:
.regex /foo/\u3000\u3000{xyz}{{hello}}
For reserved-annotation:
{ % foo bar \u3000\u3000 }
For private-use-annotation:
{ & foo bar \u3000\u3000 @x }
This patch removes this ambiguity, by disallowing U+3000 as the last character of a 'reserved-body'.
It thus fixes #725 and the second part of #721.
Details: