Skip to content

touch: update times on owned files with no read/write permission#12638

Open
sylvestre wants to merge 2 commits into
uutils:mainfrom
sylvestre:touch-update-times-mode0
Open

touch: update times on owned files with no read/write permission#12638
sylvestre wants to merge 2 commits into
uutils:mainfrom
sylvestre:touch-update-times-mode0

Conversation

@sylvestre

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/date/resolution (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/tail-n0f (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/pr/bounded-memory (was skipped on 'main', now failing)

@cakebaker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry, there is a conflict. In addition, two jobs fail.

@HackingRepo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sylvestre sylvestre force-pushed the touch-update-times-mode0 branch from 483f2a6 to 522440f Compare July 4, 2026 16:32
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will improve performance by 4.88%

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
✅ 330 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation sort_ascii_utf8_locale 16.1 ms 15.4 ms +4.88%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing sylvestre:touch-update-times-mode0 (522440f) with main (51529dc)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants