Repository navigation
Thinking OS v2.1.0 upgrades Understand to an audited stakeholder-question format selected through a blind comparison across four real documents.
Understand 2.1.0
The default response now contains:
- a Positive, Negative, or Mixed stance on a named result, proposal, or state of readiness;
- three answered stakeholder questions covering state, decision, and resources or the first change;
- exactly three source-specific follow-up questions, ranked by how much their answers could change interpretation or action;
- an audit line when the independent audit completed without findings;
- a final
Held:line naming source-specific analysis available on request.
The stance characterizes the source-grounded evidence or readiness. It does not approve, reject, fund, release, or otherwise make the reader's decision.
Audit and truth rules
- Independent auditing is mandatory when the host can run a separate agent; a strict self-audit is the fallback.
- Every number keeps its qualifier, scope, unit, population, period, and causal direction.
- Recommendations remain attributed recommendations rather than becoming mandates.
- Deployment terms such as current, live, or in production require explicit source support.
- Evaluative wording stays in the scoped stance; answers report source-grounded facts.
- Quoted text preserves the source's punctuation, capitalization, ranges, and spelling exactly.
Reading and shared core
- PDFs use both layout-preserving and raw text reads, preventing tables and locators from trading away multi-column reading order or quotation accuracy.
- Visibly clipped source material is disclosed and never turned into an author-side evidence gap.
- Shared reading, writing, and execution contracts remain synchronized across Understand and ELI5.
- The full reference analysis is held for follow-up rather than added to the default response.
Evaluation
- 15 positive and 15 negative Understand activation cases.
- 15 Understand output cases, including format references for long reports and evidence-first questions.
- 12 positive and 12 negative ELI5 activation cases and 6 ELI5 output cases.
- Cross-skill activation checks cover Understand, ELI5, and prompts that should activate neither.
- 21 extraction tests pass for text, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, PDF, malformed input, permissions, and overwrite protection.
- Documentation checks prevent the required
Held:line from drifting out of the README, smoke test, or full example.
Install
npx skills add vdmcb/thinking-os --skill understand -g -a claude-code -a codex -y
npx skills add vdmcb/thinking-os --skill eli5 -g -a claude-code -a codex -yStatus
Internal preview. Automated validation passes, but the human usefulness release gate remains at 0 of 5 recorded sessions and scored rubric runs are still pending. See evals/understand/STATUS.md, evals/eli5/STATUS.md, and evals/usefulness-protocol.md.