Fix: hasScrolled functionality - #54
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more). 🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/vercel/commerce/fbn85hzz0 |
Contributor
|
Good catch! |
persi123
pushed a commit
to persi123/commerce
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2021
Closes vercel#54 Removed write a review link
loan-laux
pushed a commit
to TrellisCommerce/next-commerce-bigcommerce
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2023
Fix: hasScrolled functionality
djahlor
pushed a commit
to djahlor/commerce
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2025
Fix: hasScrolled functionality
anhdd-kuro
pushed a commit
to anhdd-kuro/vercel_commerce
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2026
Fix: hasScrolled functionality
|
Completed by Sandcastle |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The function inside debounce() was never executed because debounce returns a new function.