Replace withCoalescedInvoke with ResponseCache#26997
Merged
kodiakhq[bot] merged 35 commits intovercel:canaryfrom Jul 12, 2021
Merged
Replace withCoalescedInvoke with ResponseCache#26997kodiakhq[bot] merged 35 commits intovercel:canaryfrom
withCoalescedInvoke with ResponseCache#26997kodiakhq[bot] merged 35 commits intovercel:canaryfrom
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Member
Failing test suitesCommit: 1975b62 test/integration/route-load-cancel/test/index.test.js
Expand output● next/dynamic › dev mode › should cancel slow page loads on re-navigation |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
shuding
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2021
Member
shuding
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The implementation of response-cache looks great to me, also the code structure is so much simpler now, thanks!
ijjk
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2021
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Member
Stats from current PRDefault Build (Decrease detected ✓)General Overall increase
|
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| buildDuration | 12.5s | 12.4s | -106ms |
| buildDurationCached | 3s | 2.9s | -55ms |
| nodeModulesSize | 49.3 MB | 49.3 MB |
Page Load Tests Overall decrease ⚠️
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| / failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
| / total time (seconds) | 2.041 | 2.046 | 0 |
| / avg req/sec | 1224.76 | 1222 | |
| /error-in-render failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
| /error-in-render total time (seconds) | 1.103 | 1.126 | |
| /error-in-render avg req/sec | 2266.7 | 2219.76 |
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 359.HASH.js gzip | 3.09 kB | 3.09 kB | ✓ |
| framework-HASH.js gzip | 42 kB | 42 kB | ✓ |
| main-HASH.js gzip | 20.9 kB | 20.9 kB | ✓ |
| webpack-HASH.js gzip | 1.49 kB | 1.49 kB | ✓ |
| Overall change | 67.6 kB | 67.6 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31.1 kB | 31.1 kB | ✓ |
| Overall change | 31.1 kB | 31.1 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| _app-HASH.js gzip | 803 B | 803 B | ✓ |
| _error-HASH.js gzip | 3.18 kB | 3.18 kB | ✓ |
| amp-HASH.js gzip | 526 B | 526 B | ✓ |
| css-HASH.js gzip | 329 B | 329 B | ✓ |
| hooks-HASH.js gzip | 903 B | 903 B | ✓ |
| image-HASH.js gzip | 5.69 kB | 5.69 kB | ✓ |
| index-HASH.js gzip | 261 B | 261 B | ✓ |
| link-HASH.js gzip | 1.66 kB | 1.66 kB | ✓ |
| routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 319 B | 319 B | ✓ |
| withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 320 B | 320 B | ✓ |
| bb14e60e810b..30f.css gzip | 125 B | 125 B | ✓ |
| Overall change | 14.1 kB | 14.1 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| _buildManifest.js gzip | 419 B | 419 B | ✓ |
| Overall change | 419 B | 419 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html gzip | 531 B | 531 B | ✓ |
| link.html gzip | 544 B | 544 B | ✓ |
| withRouter.html gzip | 524 B | 524 B | ✓ |
| Overall change | 1.6 kB | 1.6 kB | ✓ |
Webpack 4 Mode (Decrease detected ✓)
General Overall increase ⚠️
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| buildDuration | 10s | 10.2s | |
| buildDurationCached | 4s | 4s | -40ms |
| nodeModulesSize | 49.3 MB | 49.3 MB |
Page Load Tests Overall decrease ⚠️
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| / failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
| / total time (seconds) | 2.07 | 2.081 | |
| / avg req/sec | 1207.93 | 1201.18 | |
| /error-in-render failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
| /error-in-render total time (seconds) | 1.131 | 1.143 | |
| /error-in-render avg req/sec | 2210.66 | 2187.15 |
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.HASH.js gzip | 3.11 kB | 3.11 kB | ✓ |
| 677f882d2ed8..HASH.js gzip | 13.9 kB | 13.9 kB | ✓ |
| framework.HASH.js gzip | 41.8 kB | 41.8 kB | ✓ |
| main-HASH.js gzip | 8.17 kB | 8.17 kB | ✓ |
| webpack-HASH.js gzip | 1.19 kB | 1.19 kB | ✓ |
| Overall change | 68.1 kB | 68.1 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31.3 kB | 31.3 kB | ✓ |
| Overall change | 31.3 kB | 31.3 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| _app-HASH.js gzip | 791 B | 791 B | ✓ |
| _error-HASH.js gzip | 3.83 kB | 3.83 kB | ✓ |
| amp-HASH.js gzip | 531 B | 531 B | ✓ |
| css-HASH.js gzip | 333 B | 333 B | ✓ |
| hooks-HASH.js gzip | 910 B | 910 B | ✓ |
| index-HASH.js gzip | 230 B | 230 B | ✓ |
| link-HASH.js gzip | 1.64 kB | 1.64 kB | ✓ |
| routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 297 B | 297 B | ✓ |
| withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 293 B | 293 B | ✓ |
| e025d2764813..52f.css gzip | 125 B | 125 B | ✓ |
| Overall change | 8.98 kB | 8.98 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| _buildManifest.js gzip | 418 B | 418 B | ✓ |
| Overall change | 418 B | 418 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
| vercel/next.js canary | azukaru/next.js x-add-response-cache | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html gzip | 575 B | 575 B | ✓ |
| link.html gzip | 586 B | 586 B | ✓ |
| withRouter.html gzip | 568 B | 568 B | ✓ |
| Overall change | 1.73 kB | 1.73 kB | ✓ |
flybayer
pushed a commit
to blitz-js/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2021
By itself, `withCoalescedInvoke` with a separate `this.incrementalCache.set(...)` isn't really suitable for streaming responses. Since streaming is asynchronous, updating the cache separately introduces a gap where another origin request for the same resource could be made. This could potentially be addressed by moving the cache update, but then `IncrementalCache` itself would need to be made to support streaming, in addition to the many other responsibilities it has. In this case, it seemed best to just use composition to add another caching layer in front of it, which is a familiar and understandable concept. Eventually, we might want to move this cache to the HTTP layer, which will also be simpler with this change. As an added bonus, `renderToResponseWithComponents` becomes significantly simpler, and we delete some duplication.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
By itself,
withCoalescedInvokewith a separatethis.incrementalCache.set(...)isn't really suitable for streaming responses. Since streaming is asynchronous, updating the cache separately introduces a gap where another origin request for the same resource could be made.This could potentially be addressed by moving the cache update, but then
IncrementalCacheitself would need to be made to support streaming, in addition to the many other responsibilities it has. In this case, it seemed best to just use composition to add another caching layer in front of it, which is a familiar and understandable concept. Eventually, we might want to move this cache to the HTTP layer, which will also be simpler with this change.As an added bonus,
renderToResponseWithComponentsbecomes significantly simpler, and we delete some duplication.