Align issue triage guidance with automated behavior#94189
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Tests PassedCommit: 996f9f1 |
Contributor
Stats from current PR🟢 1 improvement
📊 All Metrics📖 Metrics GlossaryDev Server Metrics:
Build Metrics:
Change Thresholds:
⚡ Dev Server
📦 Dev Server (Webpack) (Legacy)📦 Dev Server (Webpack)
⚡ Production Builds
📦 Production Builds (Webpack) (Legacy)📦 Production Builds (Webpack)
📦 Bundle SizesBundle Sizes⚡ TurbopackClient Main Bundles
Server Middleware
Build DetailsBuild Manifests
📦 WebpackClient Main Bundles
Polyfills
Pages
Server Edge SSR
Middleware
Build DetailsBuild Manifests
Build Cache
🔄 Shared (bundler-independent)Runtimes
📝 Changed Files (25 files)Files with changes:
View diffsapp-page-exp..ntime.dev.jsfailed to diffapp-page-exp..time.prod.jsfailed to diffapp-page-tur..ntime.dev.jsfailed to diffapp-page-tur..time.prod.jsfailed to diffapp-page-tur..ntime.dev.jsfailed to diffapp-page-tur..time.prod.jsfailed to diffapp-page.runtime.dev.jsfailed to diffapp-page.runtime.prod.jsfailed to diffapp-route-ex..ntime.dev.jsDiff too large to display app-route-ex..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display app-route-tu..ntime.dev.jsDiff too large to display app-route-tu..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display app-route-tu..ntime.dev.jsDiff too large to display app-route-tu..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display app-route.runtime.dev.jsDiff too large to display app-route.ru..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display pages-api.runtime.dev.jsDiff too large to display pages-api.ru..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display pages.runtime.dev.jsDiff too large to display pages.runtime.prod.jsDiff too large to display server.runtime.prod.jsDiff too large to display use-cache-pr..ntime.dev.jsDiff too large to display use-cache-pr..ntime.dev.jsDiff too large to display use-cache-pr..ntime.dev.jsDiff too large to display use-cache-pr..ntime.dev.jsDiff too large to display 📎 Tarball URLCommit: 996f9f1 |
icyJoseph
approved these changes
May 28, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
Why?
The documented triage contract had drifted from the active automation: the guide described 30-day response windows and unsupported triage labeling, while automated comments implied that timed closure immediately locks issues. This sets inaccurate expectations for reporters and maintainers.
How?
Update the four Markdown surfaces that explain manual triage and automated follow-up behavior to match the existing stale and lock workflows.
Verification
pnpm prettier --with-node-modules --ignore-path .prettierignore --check contributing/repository/triaging.md .github/comments/invalid-reproduction.md .github/comments/simplify-reproduction.md .github/comments/verify-canary.mdgit diff --cached --checkpnpm --filter=next build(documentation and GitHub comment text only; no framework source changes)