Skip to content

Parmys Regression Tests #2473

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
vaughnbetz merged 80 commits into from
Jan 4, 2024
Merged

Parmys Regression Tests #2473

vaughnbetz merged 80 commits into from
Jan 4, 2024

Conversation

@poname
Copy link
Contributor

@poname poname commented Dec 27, 2023 •
edited
Loading

This PR introduces specific regression tests for the Parmys frontend with strict checks on circuit statistics, cell types, warnings, and errors.

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed

poname added 30 commits December 23, 2023 14:14
@poname
Copy link
Contributor Author

poname commented Jan 4, 2024

@vaughnbetz This PR is ready.

@poname poname marked this pull request as ready for review January 4, 2024 15:31
@poname poname changed the title [WIP] Parmys Regression Test Parmys Regression Tests Jan 4, 2024
@vaughnbetz vaughnbetz merged commit 69f9ebe into verilog-to-routing:master Jan 4, 2024
@poname poname deleted the parmys-reg-test branch January 4, 2024 17:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@poname @vaughnbetz