Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 14, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
ruff (source, changelog) 0.4.8 -> 0.4.9 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

astral-sh/ruff (ruff)

v0.4.9

Compare Source

Preview features
  • [pylint] Implement consider-dict-items (C0206) (#​11688)
  • [refurb] Implement repeated-global (FURB154) (#​11187)
Rule changes
  • [pycodestyle] Adapt fix for E203 to work identical to ruff format (#​10999)
Formatter
  • Fix formatter instability for lines only consisting of zero-width characters (#​11748)
Server
  • Add supported commands in server capabilities (#​11850)
  • Use real file path when available in ruff server (#​11800)
  • Improve error message when a command is run on an unavailable document (#​11823)
  • Introduce the ruff.printDebugInformation command (#​11831)
  • Tracing system now respects log level and trace level, with options to log to a file (#​11747)
CLI
  • Handle non-printable characters in diff view (#​11687)
Bug fixes
  • [refurb] Avoid suggesting starmap when arguments are used outside call (FURB140) (#​11830)
  • [flake8-bugbear] Avoid panic in B909 when checking large loop blocks (#​11772)
  • [refurb] Fix misbehavior of operator.itemgetter when getter param is a tuple (FURB118) (#​11774)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (1522948) 500 500 100.00%
Head commit (7ea2fc6) 500 (+0) 500 (+0) 100.00% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#312) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences


🚀 Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (1522948) to head (7ea2fc6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #312   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           18        18           
  Lines          500       500           
  Branches        43        43           
=========================================
  Hits           500       500           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vil02 vil02 merged commit e70d01b into master Jun 14, 2024
@vil02 vil02 deleted the renovate/ruff-0.x branch June 14, 2024 17:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants