Skip to content

Conversation

@vinitkumar
Copy link
Owner

@vinitkumar vinitkumar commented Oct 23, 2025

This PR adds support for Python 3.15 alpha testing and modernizes the ruff linting setup by switching from a pip-installed version to using uvx for direct execution.

Added Python 3.15.0-alpha.1 to the CI test matrix
Removed separate ruff installation step in favor of using uvx to run ruff directly

Summary by Sourcery

Add support for Python 3.15 alpha in CI and modernize Ruff linting by running it through uvx instead of a separate installation

CI:

  • Add Python 3.15.0-alpha.1 to the GitHub Actions test matrix
  • Remove separate pip installation of Ruff and run Ruff via uvx directly

@vinitkumar vinitkumar requested review from Copilot October 23, 2025 20:46
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for Python 3.15 alpha testing and modernizes the ruff linting setup by switching from a pip-installed version to using uvx for direct execution.

  • Added Python 3.15.0-alpha.1 to the CI test matrix
  • Removed separate ruff installation step in favor of using uvx to run ruff directly

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 23, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.30%. Comparing base (91ef7e3) to head (593cd40).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #255   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.30%   99.30%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         288      288           
=======================================
  Hits          286      286           
  Misses          2        2           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.30% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 23, 2025

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

This PR extends the GitHub Actions CI to test against Python 3.15 alpha and streamlines the ruff linting workflow by removing its separate installation and leveraging uvx for direct execution.

Flow diagram for updated ruff linting step in CI

flowchart TD
  A["Install dependencies with uv"] --> B["Run ruff using uvx"]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Add Python 3.15 alpha to the CI test matrix
  • Expanded the python-version matrix to include '3.15.0-alpha.1'
.github/workflows/pythonpackage.yml
Modernize ruff linting with uvx
  • Removed the standalone ruff installation step
  • Replaced direct 'ruff' command with 'uvx ruff' for linting
.github/workflows/pythonpackage.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@vinitkumar vinitkumar merged commit e5ab104 into master Oct 23, 2025
47 of 48 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

  • Add an explicit step to install or pin uvx before calling 'uvx ruff' so the CI won’t fail if uvx isn’t already available.
  • Combine the two 'uv pip install' commands into one to reduce redundant installs and speed up the workflow.
  • Consider marking the Python 3.15 alpha job as allowed-to-fail in the matrix since alpha releases can break unpredictably.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- Add an explicit step to install or pin uvx before calling 'uvx ruff' so the CI won’t fail if uvx isn’t already available.
- Combine the two 'uv pip install' commands into one to reduce redundant installs and speed up the workflow.
- Consider marking the Python 3.15 alpha job as allowed-to-fail in the matrix since alpha releases can break unpredictably.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants