Enable Robolectric paused mode#35
Merged
Merged
Conversation
neworld
approved these changes
Sep 13, 2023
kyrillosgait
approved these changes
Sep 13, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm preparing for a Robolectric upgrade and from Robolectric 4.4
LooperMode.PAUSEDis enabled by default. That means, that we have to executeshadowOf(getMainLooper()).idle()when we want to run all the runnables that are queued to run on the main thread.In this case, we are having a Fragment transaction that is not run instantly. After the Fragment transaction, we have to execute
shadowOf(getMainLooper()).idle()in order to run this Fragment transaction. Also, there is a problem that Coper blocks the coroutine until the user gives permission. So those tests were stuck until the timeout.So I've created a function that runs a particular code block and
shadowOf(getMainLooper()).idle()at the same time in order to avoid this problem