Normalize Execution #7278

Performance Regression: -23.82%

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 24 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1096 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1530 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	`chunked_bool_canonical_into[(1000, 10)]`	60.3 µs	49.9 µs	+20.85%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.1)]`	246.7 µs	320 µs	-22.9%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.05)]`	131.2 µs	168.1 µs	-21.95%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 0.5)]`	1.2 ms	1.5 ms	-23.7%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.005, 1.0)]`	2.3 ms	3.1 ms	-23.82%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 1.0)]`	2.5 ms	3.3 ms	-22.35%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 1.0)]`	3.5 ms	4.3 ms	-17.11%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.05)]`	212.1 µs	249 µs	-14.82%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.1)]`	386.1 µs	459.5 µs	-15.96%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.5)]`	1.3 ms	1.6 ms	-22.24%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.1)]`	267.5 µs	340.8 µs	-21.51%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.05)]`	165.5 µs	197 µs	-15.99%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.1, 0.5)]`	1.8 ms	2.2 ms	-16.96%
❌	Simulation	`take_search[(0.01, 0.05)]`	142.3 µs	179.2 µs	-20.59%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.1)]`	314.2 µs	376.6 µs	-16.58%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 1.0)]`	3.2 ms	3.9 ms	-16.07%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.05)]`	178.4 µs	209.9 µs	-15%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.5)]`	1.6 ms	1.9 ms	-16.01%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.1, 0.1)]`	449.6 µs	512 µs	-12.2%
❌	Simulation	`take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.5)]`	1.5 ms	1.8 ms	-17.05%
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

_{Comparing ngates/normalize-execution (042c636) with develop (29a5f43)}

1530 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩