Bump msrv and rust-toolchain to 1.91 (and lance for benchmarks) #7595
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
failed
Apr 22, 2026 in 0s
Performance Regression: -60.31%
⚡ 28 improved benchmarks
❌ 18 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1117 untouched benchmarks
⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | encode_varbinview[(1000, 2)] |
163.7 µs | 242.5 µs | -32.48% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bench_many_codes_few_values[1024] |
367.2 µs | 438.6 µs | -16.29% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bench_sparse_coverage[0.01] |
437.3 µs | 367.6 µs | +18.97% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | case_when_nary_early_dominant[1000] |
154.6 µs | 138.9 µs | +11.32% |
| ❌ | Simulation | case_when_nary_equality_lookup[1000] |
184.3 µs | 205.8 µs | -10.46% |
| ❌ | Simulation | filter_powerlaw_by_correlated_runs[1000] |
25.4 µs | 28.9 µs | -12.05% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | filter_ultra_sparse[10000] |
22.4 µs | 17.5 µs | +28.36% |
| ❌ | Simulation | varbinview_large |
172.4 µs | 434.4 µs | -60.31% |
| ❌ | Simulation | execute_scalar_struct_simple |
561.9 µs | 629.4 µs | -10.72% |
| ❌ | Simulation | varbinview_small |
133 µs | 149.2 µs | -10.85% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_filter_slice_mask_random_indices[10000, 1000] |
212.9 µs | 190.2 µs | +11.93% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_filter_slice_mask_random_indices[50000, 10000] |
990.2 µs | 879 µs | +12.65% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_filter_slice_mask_random_indices[50000, 1000] |
901.4 µs | 789.9 µs | +14.11% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_filter_slice_mask_sequential_indices[50000, 10000] |
979.3 µs | 867.8 µs | +12.85% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_filter_slice_mask_sequential_indices[50000, 1000] |
899.3 µs | 788.8 µs | +14% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_filter_slice_mask_sequential_indices[10000, 1000] |
212.5 µs | 189.3 µs | +12.22% |
| ❌ | Simulation | varbinview_zip_block_mask |
2.9 ms | 3.7 ms | -21.54% |
| ❌ | Simulation | varbinview_zip_fragmented_mask |
6.4 ms | 7.3 ms | -12.33% |
| ❌ | Simulation | old_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 32768] |
224.8 µs | 255.2 µs | -11.89% |
| ❌ | Simulation | new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 32768] |
192 µs | 251.7 µs | -23.73% |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.
Comparing adamg/bump-toolchain (b2318a4) with develop (30042ee)
Loading