Skip CUDA codspeed benchmarks if there were no cuda changes#8657
1 benchmark regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1594 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 4 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | slice_empty_vortex |
339.4 ns | 397.8 ns | -14.66% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] |
244.4 ns | 215.3 ns | +13.55% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024] |
304.7 ns | 275.6 ns | +10.58% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing rk/skipcudacodspeed (67ea3ea) with develop (5e656ee)
Footnotes
-
4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩