Replies: 4 comments
|
It's hardly my place to comment, since I have spent zero time considering this and I am not an active contributor to this project, but I'll just say "that's crazy!" I never heard of this, and I have been playing professionally for forty years. Of course, my experience is all jazz and orchestral. Anyway, carry on the actual discussion. |
|
Yes, indeed this is crazy. Apparently there was confusion about this notation in Chopin's day, and the book The Secret Life of Musical Notation navigates this madness. The author explains how various publishers back in the day and since then have "corrected" various scores upon publication, so even what we believe to be historical scores can be misleading. My copy of the book finally arrived, and 67 pages comprising its first chapter is devoted to this subject. The book gives examples of notation with accompanying audio linked from the author's website, the address of which appears on the page before Chapter One begins. I've attempted contacting Logan Skelton (U of Mich professor from the video), but his web page (linked above) indicates that he is on leave until start of 2026. Please discuss with Logan Skelton and/or review that chapter before dismissing this issue. |
|
This is one of the reasons why MusicXML elements refer to what you see on the page rather than mandating semantics for the symbols. I think it's fine to keep the documentation and descriptions referring just to the commonly accepted interpretation. |
|
For my inauguration as MusicXML editor, I moved this topic to the discussion forum. Thanks for this information! This is the kind of real-life cultural context that enriches the community. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
MusicXML already provides the wedge element for when hairpin notation indicates crescendo/diminuendo.
This is NOT a request to change existing behavior.
However, the "hairpin" notation means agogic inflection (often interpreted as rubato) when in context of the romantic period composers such as Chopin and generations of students who've descended from them.
A recent video gives context and details.
See: Ben Laude's 2025 video, The Most Misunderstood Symbol in Music (ft. Seymour Bernstein), which addresses both uses and historical context for our confusion about the hairpin notation. (Disclosure: it's sponsored by the Chopin institute-- implying a bit of credibility. I have no affiliation with any of these characters.)
In lieu of watching a video, resources from it follow.
Advocacy of hairpin as change in rhythm:
< >, as used by Brahms, often occurs when he wishes to express great sincerity and warmth, applied not only to tone, but to rhythm too."https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/secret-life-of-musical-notation-9781574671841/
On why most who were trained since early 20th Century treat hairpin as cresc./dimin., the video references:
Contemporary examples found in the wild:
EDIT: added bibliographic details for completeness and qualified "rubato" with "agogic inflection (often interpreted as rubato)"
All reactions