Skip to content

Conversation

@bf4
Copy link
Collaborator

@bf4 bf4 commented Feb 11, 2014

@yorickpeterse
Copy link
Contributor

What's the reason for removing the Rbx Gems? The build will probably fail without them.

@yorickpeterse
Copy link
Contributor

That is, Rbx might internally solve the rubysl stuff for a bunch of Gems but I'm not sure if it does so for every library Parser (and its dependencies) use.

@whitequark
Copy link
Owner

ok, apparently this removes special treatment of rbx... and build has passed. so merging

whitequark added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2014
Update Travis CI to specify rubinius 2
@whitequark whitequark merged commit 759362f into master Feb 11, 2014
@bf4
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bf4 commented Feb 11, 2014

@yorickpeterse I saw Brian Shirai making this PR in a number of places, followed up on why, and am sharing the love :) https://github.com/brixen

@bf4 bf4 deleted the update_travis_rbx_config branch February 11, 2014 22:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants