Skip to content

WPB-23789: Wrap Galley updateLocalConversation#5075

Merged
blackheaven merged 5 commits intodevelopfrom
gdifolco/WPB-23789-wrap-update-sing
Mar 3, 2026
Merged

WPB-23789: Wrap Galley updateLocalConversation#5075
blackheaven merged 5 commits intodevelopfrom
gdifolco/WPB-23789-wrap-update-sing

Conversation

@blackheaven
Copy link
Contributor

https://wearezeta.atlassian.net/browse/WPB-23789

Checklist

  • Add a new entry in an appropriate subdirectory of changelog.d
  • Read and follow the PR guidelines

@blackheaven blackheaven requested review from a team as code owners March 2, 2026 18:21
@zebot zebot added the ok-to-test Approved for running tests in CI, overrides not-ok-to-test if both labels exist label Mar 2, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@fisx fisx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not small, but neat! :)

perhaps you can to motivate the change in the changelog? otherwise good 👍

@fisx
Copy link
Contributor

fisx commented Mar 2, 2026

The CI failures look almost legit / non-fake, though. 🤔

Comment on lines +1 to +2
Refactor: introduce specific wrapper functions for `updateLocalConversation` instead of using type applications.
The idea is to progressively move away from singletons to type class to allow progressive migration to `wire-subsystems`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To me this is too specific for a changelog. This could be in the PR description, though.

@blackheaven blackheaven merged commit 559b96d into develop Mar 3, 2026
10 checks passed
@blackheaven blackheaven deleted the gdifolco/WPB-23789-wrap-update-sing branch March 3, 2026 16:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ok-to-test Approved for running tests in CI, overrides not-ok-to-test if both labels exist

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants