test: improve reliability of history backup test [WPB-22420]

[markbrockhoff]

WPB-22420 [Web] General maintenance ticket for PR merges

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Issues

If the deletion of the group conversation in TC-1097 took too long it could happen that it was still included within the created backup.

Solutions

This PR waits for the conversation to be no longer visible before creating the backup to make it more reliable.

---

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

• Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

🔗 Download Full Report Artifact

🧪 Playwright Test Summary

• ✅ Passed: 14
• ❌ Failed: 0
• ⏭ Skipped: 0
• 🔁 Flaky: 1
• 📊 Total: 15
• ⏱ Total Runtime: 136.7s (~ 2 min 17 sec)

specs/CriticalFlow/groupCalls-TC-8632.spec.ts (❌ 0 failed, ⚠️ 1 flaky)

• ⚠️ Planning group call with sending various messages during call (tags: TC-8632, crit-flow-web)