test(cliffs): the two WEST observations are independent (#84) - #152
Merged
Conversation
#150 localised the border residual to the west chunk edge; #142 separately found all six ore-recall cells with their nearest resource to the WEST. If those were one phenomenon, two open threads would collapse into one. They are not. Zero capture, scored against the game's own dumped resource entities. within 32 tiles nearest resource WEST base (8,393 raw cells) 21.3% 47.1% west-edge survivors (9) 2 of 9 44.4% other survivors (15) 3 of 15 60.0% West-edge survivors are no closer to ore than the other survivors, and their nearest resource points west slightly LESS often than the base rate. Whatever produces the west-edge concentration, it is not the ore. A signal that looks real at 3 sigma and is not: at a 64-tile radius the survivors look resource-proximate, 70.8% against a 40.2% base, z = 3.06. Two things kill it, and both are asserted in the spec so it cannot be rediscovered and believed: - The scale is wrong for a cell-level cause. Nothing at 16 tiles (z = 0.81) or 32 (z = -0.05). An effect absent at short range and present only at 64 tiles is describing a REGION, not a cell. - n_eff is ~9, not 24. The 24 survivors sit in 9 regions and the within-64 outcome is nearly all-or-nothing per region - four regions have ALL their survivors inside 64 tiles, two have NONE - so the binomial z over 24 cells is inflated. Same failure as the ore/cliff "100x below chance" claim. Where #84 stands: five mechanisms ruled out for the border residual (#134, #143, #149, #150, #151), and the ore now ruled out as the cause of its west signature. The west concentration stands at z = 2.6-2.9 across every sweep-order arm, on 17-24 border cells over 14 regions - and that n has never been raised. Raising it out of sample is the honest next step before another mechanism hunt. Verified: pnpm run verify green - 1584 app (up 6) + 13 worker + 3 container, 0 warnings, exit 0. Measurement only; shipping accuracy unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HKjzpWJw1HbnigPP9udqN2
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#150 localised the border residual to the west chunk edge; #142 separately found all six ore-recall cells with their nearest resource to the west. If those were one phenomenon, two open threads would collapse into one.
They are not. No capture - scored against the game's own dumped resource entities, not the port's model.
The west edge is not about ore
West-edge survivors are no closer to resources than the other survivors, and their nearest resource points west slightly less often than the base rate. Whatever produces the west-edge concentration, it is not the ore.
A signal that looks real at 3 sigma, and is not
At a 64-tile radius the survivors do look resource-proximate: 70.8% against a 40.2% base, z = 3.06. Two things kill it, and both are asserted in the spec so it cannot be rediscovered and believed:
That is the same failure as the old ore/cliff "100× below chance" claim, which assumed tile independence. Worth catching twice.
Where #84 stands
Five mechanisms are ruled out for the chunk-border residual - orientation-reach (#134), cascade double-counting (#143), the cross-chunk cascade (#149),
updateConnections(#150), the sweep's edge order (#151) - and the ore is now ruled out as the cause of its west signature.The west concentration itself stands at z = 2.6-2.9 across every sweep-order arm, on 17-24 border cells over 14 regions. That n has never been raised. Raising it out of sample is the honest next step before another mechanism hunt - this repo has been burned before by a signal that looked solid at n=14 and needed raising rather than slicing.
Verification
pnpm run verifygreen - 1584 app (up 6) + 13 worker + 3 container tests, 0 warnings, exit 0. Measurement only; shipping accuracy unchanged.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01HKjzpWJw1HbnigPP9udqN2