Skip to content

test(cliffs): the two WEST observations are independent (#84) - #152

Merged
wormeyman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cliffs-west-ore-correlation
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

test(cliffs): the two WEST observations are independent (#84)#152
wormeyman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cliffs-west-ore-correlation

Conversation

@wormeyman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

#150 localised the border residual to the west chunk edge; #142 separately found all six ore-recall cells with their nearest resource to the west. If those were one phenomenon, two open threads would collapse into one.

They are not. No capture - scored against the game's own dumped resource entities, not the port's model.

The west edge is not about ore

within 32 tiles of a resource nearest resource lies WEST
base (8,393 raw cells) 21.3% 47.1%
west-edge survivors (9) 2 of 9 44.4%
other survivors (15) 3 of 15 60.0%

West-edge survivors are no closer to resources than the other survivors, and their nearest resource points west slightly less often than the base rate. Whatever produces the west-edge concentration, it is not the ore.

A signal that looks real at 3 sigma, and is not

At a 64-tile radius the survivors do look resource-proximate: 70.8% against a 40.2% base, z = 3.06. Two things kill it, and both are asserted in the spec so it cannot be rediscovered and believed:

  • The scale is wrong for a cell-level cause. Nothing appears at 16 tiles (z = 0.81) or 32 (z = −0.05). An effect absent at short range and present only at 64 tiles is describing a region, not a cell.
  • n_eff is ~9, not 24. The 24 survivors sit in 9 regions, and the within-64 outcome is nearly all-or-nothing per region - four regions have ALL their survivors inside 64 tiles, two have NONE. The cells are not independent draws, so a binomial z over 24 of them is inflated.

That is the same failure as the old ore/cliff "100× below chance" claim, which assumed tile independence. Worth catching twice.

Where #84 stands

Five mechanisms are ruled out for the chunk-border residual - orientation-reach (#134), cascade double-counting (#143), the cross-chunk cascade (#149), updateConnections (#150), the sweep's edge order (#151) - and the ore is now ruled out as the cause of its west signature.

The west concentration itself stands at z = 2.6-2.9 across every sweep-order arm, on 17-24 border cells over 14 regions. That n has never been raised. Raising it out of sample is the honest next step before another mechanism hunt - this repo has been burned before by a signal that looked solid at n=14 and needed raising rather than slicing.

Verification

pnpm run verify green - 1584 app (up 6) + 13 worker + 3 container tests, 0 warnings, exit 0. Measurement only; shipping accuracy unchanged.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01HKjzpWJw1HbnigPP9udqN2

#150 localised the border residual to the west chunk edge; #142 separately found
all six ore-recall cells with their nearest resource to the WEST. If those were
one phenomenon, two open threads would collapse into one. They are not. Zero
capture, scored against the game's own dumped resource entities.

                          within 32 tiles    nearest resource WEST
  base (8,393 raw cells)          21.3%              47.1%
  west-edge survivors (9)         2 of 9             44.4%
  other survivors (15)            3 of 15            60.0%

West-edge survivors are no closer to ore than the other survivors, and their
nearest resource points west slightly LESS often than the base rate. Whatever
produces the west-edge concentration, it is not the ore.

A signal that looks real at 3 sigma and is not: at a 64-tile radius the survivors
look resource-proximate, 70.8% against a 40.2% base, z = 3.06. Two things kill
it, and both are asserted in the spec so it cannot be rediscovered and believed:

- The scale is wrong for a cell-level cause. Nothing at 16 tiles (z = 0.81) or 32
  (z = -0.05). An effect absent at short range and present only at 64 tiles is
  describing a REGION, not a cell.
- n_eff is ~9, not 24. The 24 survivors sit in 9 regions and the within-64
  outcome is nearly all-or-nothing per region - four regions have ALL their
  survivors inside 64 tiles, two have NONE - so the binomial z over 24 cells is
  inflated. Same failure as the ore/cliff "100x below chance" claim.

Where #84 stands: five mechanisms ruled out for the border residual (#134, #143,
#149, #150, #151), and the ore now ruled out as the cause of its west signature.
The west concentration stands at z = 2.6-2.9 across every sweep-order arm, on
17-24 border cells over 14 regions - and that n has never been raised. Raising it
out of sample is the honest next step before another mechanism hunt.

Verified: pnpm run verify green - 1584 app (up 6) + 13 worker + 3 container,
0 warnings, exit 0. Measurement only; shipping accuracy unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HKjzpWJw1HbnigPP9udqN2
@wormeyman
wormeyman merged commit c5bf2bd into main Aug 5, 2026
6 checks passed
@wormeyman
wormeyman deleted the cliffs-west-ore-correlation branch August 5, 2026 00:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant