Fix PHPCS errors in Behat test files

[swissspidy]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Style
  • Improved formatting consistency in embedded test examples by adding spacing around conditional statements.
  • No changes to application functionality or runtime behavior.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 2b7088b6-954f-4a2e-b6ed-811ad3fbfde2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a311b7 and 0433971.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• features/install-wp-tests.feature

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remains after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The change formats four embedded PHP conditional blocks in WordPress installation scenarios. It adds spaces around if conditions without changing logic or runtime behavior.

Changes

Installation test formatting

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Scenario conditional formatting features/install-wp-tests.feature	Four PHPUnit version-selection condition blocks now use consistent spacing around if parentheses. Runtime behavior remains unchanged.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 04339

This change only reformats test conditions without changing their behavior. No actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

Suggested reviewers: brianhenryie

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the formatting changes made to resolve PHPCS errors in the Behat test file.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/tests-lint

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!