[wpimath] Make Java take lists instead of Vectors where C++ takes wpi::arrays

[calcmogul]

A lot of wpimath Java APIs take a Vector<N> type, but VecBuilder.fill(...) is more verbose than List.of(...).

[PeterJohnson]

Doesn’t that require boxing? You can’t have a List<double>, only a List<Double>.

[calcmogul]

The Vector<N> type requires boxing anyway.

[auscompgeek]

Would it make sense for any of them to take primitive arrays instead?

[calcmogul]

Depends on whether we like new double[]{ ... } better syntax-wise. It's not terrible to type, and it doesn't require a random import like Vector<N> does.

[KangarooKoala]

Just to help for comparison:

// Vector
foo(VecBuilder.fill(1.0, 2.0, 3.0));
// List
foo(List.of(1.0, 2.0, 3.0));
// Array
foo(new double[] { 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 });

[calcmogul]

The second one is shortest and is likely more familiar due to it using a standard Java container, but knowing the correct import is still an issue (java.util.List). The third one requires no imports, but the syntax is rather arcane. Neither are my favorite, but I'd accept either.