docs(parallel-issues): document post-squash-merge conflicts - #432
Merged
Conversation
Explain how to prove a stacked branch is a content superset before resolving the expected post-squash merge-down conflict, and link the procedure from auto-merge serialization. Co-Authored-By: Codex gpt-5.6-sol <noreply@openai.com>
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Comment |
Collaborator
Author
|
This was written agentically; verify its assertions: Adversarial review receipt
🤖 Co-authored by Codex gpt-5.6-sol. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was written agentically; verify its assertions:
Why
Stacked pull requests can conflict after a predecessor is squash-merged even when the successor already carries the predecessor’s content. The workflow needs a content-evidence procedure so an agent does not duplicate changes by choosing a conflict side blindly.
What
Decisions
base=origin/main
files=3
total.insertions=49
total.deletions=1
total.lines=50
operational.files=3
operational.insertions=49
operational.deletions=1
operational.lines=50
generated.files=0
generated.insertions=0
generated.deletions=0
generated.lines=0
lockfile.files=0
lockfile.insertions=0
lockfile.deletions=0
lockfile.lines=0
fixture.files=0
fixture.insertions=0
fixture.deletions=0
fixture.lines=0
non_operational.files=0
non_operational.insertions=0
non_operational.deletions=0
non_operational.lines=0
Testing
.agent/logs/20260824T144714Z-test.log.test-agent-preflight.shcache assertions; reproduced unchanged at base2f7509ein.agent/logs/20260824T145154Z-test.log.🤖 Co-authored by Codex gpt-5.6-sol.
Closes #425